Consult Rudman

Hannah Rudman Gets IT for 21st C culture

Archive for classical music

Classical music and digital innovation: myth or magic?


If you’re interested in joining the first-ever collaborative online orchestra, then professionals (outside of a contract) and amateur musicians of all ages, locations and instruments are welcome to audition for the YouTube Symphony Orchestra by submitting a video performance of a new piece written for the occasion by the renowned Chinese composer Tan Dun (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon). YouTube have created a special site that contains the tools to help you learn the music, rehearse with the conductor and upload your part for the collaborative video.

And how do you get to Carnegie Hall? Practice and upload. Send us your talent video performance from a list of recommended pieces. Finalists will be chosen by a judging panel and YouTube users to travel to New York in April 2009, to participate in the YouTube Symphony Orchestra summit, and play at Carnegie Hall under the direction of Michael Tilson Thomas. The deadline for all video submissions is January 28, 2009. The competition looks stiff – the Symphony project’s introductory video has already been downloaded over 95,000 times.

The LSO are supporting Symphony by providing instrumental masterclasses via their own YouTube channel. For example Maxine Kwok-Adams, first violin gives tips on how to bow a certain section of the new piece, as well as exploring Elgar’s Enigma in her masterclass (viewed over 8,000 times already):

As one of the four classical music institutions partnering the Symphony project, the LSO are building a significant online community, which has to be the highest online priority for classical music institutions. However, this project was not their idea – Google (who own YouTube) came up with it, and then found partners.

Greg Sandow thinks this is a reflection on the lack of innovation being embraced by the sector:

“So this YouTube thing, big as it is, is at bottom just another one of those ideas. And the ideas succeed because somebody loves them. Contrast this with a foundation project I was part of, where classical music institutions were enlisted — with funding as the carrot — in a long-term program designed to get them to innovate. Some of the innovations weren’t bad, but many were dutiful, cooked up in response to someone else’s urgency. From this I learned that “innovation” is a suspicious word. Truly innovative people don’t innovate, or at least not as any kind of conscious project. Instead, they embrace new ideas — either because the ideas solve a problem, or else just because the people involved love them — and make those ideas happen.”

My own experience, currently working with Scotland’s national classical music companies, is that there is a hunger for innovation. Yesterday, Bill Thompson and Nesta’s Rohan Gunatillake spoke to Scotland’s Five National Performing Companies at a workshop I’d organised for them on Horizon Scanning – part of a wider piece of collaborative work enabled and led by Mission Models Money. The issue is not about the attitude towards innovation, but about making space for it in the already at full-capacity day-to-day running of the organisation. We discussed open and user-led innovation models as well as thinking about how to ensure every person in the organisation has time to keep up with the latest innovations and share them with the rest of the team. The solution is not easy – it means sacrificing doing something else.

And just to prove that the classical music sector’s innovation hunger is rumbling, following London Sinfonietta’s 40th birthday concert last night, artistic director Andrew Burke says in today’s Guardian:

“we have a responsibility to seek out new ways of engaging audiences, whether through other art forms or through technology. We have to be part of the digital chatter of people’s lives.”

The wisdom of bloggers?

This 2005 TED video of James Surowiecki (The Wisdom of Crowds) still packs a punch. James explores the idea that the cumulative wisdom of bloggers and the internet may be better than that of any one individual. I’ve spoken with a few cultural organisations recently who have indicated that in the main, the content about their organisation out there in the blogosphere is “lowest common denominator”/”ill informed”, etc. Surowiecki would argue that the average point made would be well made, which means that as cultural organisations we need to work harder at getting our ambassadors to talk more loudly in the groups, or heed what’s been said by listening and reacting.

Find out what people are saying about you by setting up Google Alerts and a Technorati search.

Yesterday I was talking with Scotland’s biggest Performing Arts companies about how social media should only be used in a manner that has integrity. This following a few examples where people had spammed Twitter streams with adverts. Social medias are all about conversations with trusted content providers – and conversations don’t/shouldn’t include broadcasted adverts. Or any blatent publicising. Sure, push out a URL to gather feedback and judge interest, but don’t spam!

Coincidentally, US classical music blogger Greg Sandow today complained:
“Don’t even think of trying this!
In a new and most unfortunate development, an otherwise reputable orchestra has tried to advertise a concert by posting a comment on my blog. And also on Amanda Ameer’s, and no doubt on other blogs, too. These comments were nothing but advertising copy. I deleted the one on this blog the moment I saw it, and sent a stern e-mail to the orchestra’s marketing director.

I hope it’s clear that this way of advertising is completely inappropriate. (And also that my outrage at this has nothing to do with the orchestra’s music.) For one thing, ArtsJournal sells ads on these blogs, and can hardly tolerate people trying to use them to advertise for free. But far beyond that, spam comments would disrupt the fine conversations we have on this blog. Nobody wants to wade through advertising to see the latest posts. I can’t quite imagine what this orchestra was thinking, but clearly they have no idea how blogs work (a milder way of saying that they don’t respect the integrity of what we do here).

So if anyone else, God forbid, is thinking of doing this — don’t. I don’t care how terrific your music might be. Your ads, if they showed up here as comments, would just be a new kind of spam. “

What do you think?

Having the (digital) time of your life?

Early October has seen a rash of exciting pieces of news in the music sector. The Royal Opera House made their first streamed opera available online, and you can watch it here.

Their YouTube Channel contains great 3 minute trailers, where the creatives and dancers explain the story and some of the decisions made in the rehearsal process. Tony Hall’s aim to get the ROH into every living room seems an achievable aspiration! They’re also beginning to use digital media to attract new audiences to participate with their brand, recently commissioning Blast Theory to make a piece of work for them that encouraged young audiences to participate in an online social chase game called You Get Me.

Knocked for giving away their music for free last year, it turns out that Radiohead’s artful album packaging is so popular with fans that some are paying £40 for the ‘discbox’ of an album they can download for free. This reflects the findings in Entertainment Media Research’s latest Digital Music Survey, now in its fifth year, launched yesterday.
“Despite the ubiquity of free music, there’s a real willingness by consumers to pay for music products if the package is right,” said Alexander Ross, music partner at the media law firm Wiggin, which co-authored the study. The poll surveyed 1500 people, and pointed towards the music video being the opportunity for record labels to make money: particularly with the impending launch of YouTube’s new e-commerce shop, that will allow users to purchase high-res music after watching it for free.

Clive James has been advocating the opportunity that the internet and a webcam has given him to become his own broadcast channel. Working with newspaper The Times, James experimented with interviewing high profile guests  – chat show style – in his study at home. They work really well – watch here. James particularly notes that on the web, “content matter more than gloss”, and suggests that interviews work better as guests are in a more relaxed format, and don’t have a chance to plan what they’re saying and get nervous about it (they’re not sitting around in makeup and back stage for half a day, they’re in Clive’s front door and on camera!)

The contenders for the Turner Prize have been affirming my theory that art forms and ways of interpreting them are beginning to have far blurrier borders because of the impact of digital media. In their work, digital native artists such as Runa Islam are beginning to pose questions such as “Do you look at a film? Do you read it? Do you illustrate with a camera, or do you write with a camera?”

Last Thursday, the Guardian’s Victor Keegan considered the impact of cheap computers on silver surfers – particularly those just about to retire, part of the “baby boomer” generation. Claiming that cheap PCs will make connectivity available to even poor pensioners, and noting their proclivity to want to stay in touch and be up-to-date, we should make sure that our digital offering speaks in the right tone to our audience members as well as the digital natives.With offerings like the ROH’s opera online, and high quality Medici.tv, older people who can’t get out as much, or who don’t have as much money coming in can still enjoy engagement with high culture.

Vic also reported an interesting site that arts organisations might be able to utilise for projects with silver surfers – thetimesofmylife.com encourages people to upload photos and record video and audio of their memories.

Our digital futures – now

This story was told to the English Classical Music sector’s chief executives, as a provocation, at a day of consultation on how the arts sector should respond to OfCom’s Public Service Broadcasting (PSB) review. Having also attended a previous consultation with the visual arts sector, it seems to me that the cultural sector need to be seen by OfCom as public service content providers, and therefore receive a portion of the [what is currently know as] TV License Fee. Then the hard work really starts – we have to start seeing ourselves as content publishers in the digital world!

Some shows in the Edinburgh Fringe Festival will be commenting on our new digital era this summer – art reflecting bang-up-to-date life: great to see! Read the press release here.

Bandwidth gives US orchestras new channels to audiences

Check out the Boston Symphony Orchestra’s Flash driven Boston Pops.TV mini-site.

BSOBostonPops

Its thanks to almost ubiquitous broadband that content like this can be quickly uploaded by and streamed to the end user. The content is easily navigable simply by scanning your mouse around the page – menus seamlessly pop-up and disappear, dragging markers on timelines helps you find content directly. The sound and visual quality is good – not great like the HD content I mentioned yesterday – adequate for viewing on a normal sized computer screen with average speakers. BSO have made the decision to record and host online their more popular repertoire of the Boston Pops Orchestra, a good move for a first leap into the world of .tv. The interviews with the conductor and musicians are generally informative, and add to the already substantive content that the podcasts on the classical BSO repertoire provide.

The Philadelphia Orchestra are also maximizing the opportunities of broadband, but have gone one step further. They’re experimenting with Internet2: the currently-under-development enhancing of Internet 1 (the internet as we know it now, which currently runs applications like the world wide web). Their Global Concert Series – Live and Interactive is being focussed on Higher Education Institutions – allowing campuses to bring live Philadelphia Orchestra concerts to their classrooms and performance halls through Internet2.  The programme has appeal for students, educators, administrators, and the community in local area, including:

  • entertaining, informative introductions, performance close-ups through the use of seven robotic HD cameras, interviews with musicians and conductors, and interactive discussions
  • interactive components at every concert and potential collaboration between remote sites and Verizon Hall at The Kimmel Center for the Performing Arts
  • audience participation in live interviews with Orchestra musicians and guest artists during the multicast
  • opportunities to connect with campuses around the world in “Continue the Discussion” forums with musicians, conductors, and/or guest artists online following the performance

So the added benefit here is the opportunity to be able to receive and interact back with the live performance via the internet.